Comments on: Audirvana 3 https://robcee.net/2017/audirvana-3/ The enbloggening. Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:38:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Audirvana 3.5 – robcee.net https://robcee.net/2017/audirvana-3/#comment-2985 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:38:44 +0000 http://robcee.net/?p=1322#comment-2985 […] weekend I took the plunge and sought out the newest version of Audirvana, my preferred, nay, favorite audio playback software. I’ve been using it exclusively for listening to my local collection […]

]]>
By: Rob Campbell https://robcee.net/2017/audirvana-3/#comment-2663 Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:21:34 +0000 http://robcee.net/?p=1322#comment-2663 In reply to Tom Guldbrandsen.

Hi Tom,

Great comment, and you’ve got a helluva system on the other end of your computer.

I tend to gloss over the hardware aspects other than giving the DAC a passing mention. It’s an important piece, but probably far less important than your amp, speakers and headphones. The differences between a $100 DAC vs a $1000 DAC are often not as huge as one might think.

As for cables, that’s not a topic I’m really willing to get into. Someone running a system with components of your calibre might consider spending a little more on cables than the average joe, but that is so far down the list of important pieces in terms of sonic returns that for most people, it isn’t an issue. Monoprice is the friend of the average listener.

My own setup’s pretty modest by comparison. I’m using an older Presonus Firebox audio interface going through a Mackie desktop mixer and a pair of Adam A7Xes on my desktop. My main system is a Cambridge Audio receiver, Reference 3A Episode speakers coming from a Mac Mini with Audio Engine D1 DAC. I notice a pretty significant upgrade in audio quality and spaciousness even on my system.

Oh yeah, I did pick up a pair of HIFIMAN HE4XX headphones from Massdrop recently that might warrant a review.

Anyway, thanks for stopping by! Cheers.

]]>
By: Tom Guldbrandsen https://robcee.net/2017/audirvana-3/#comment-2661 Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:12:58 +0000 http://robcee.net/?p=1322#comment-2661 Hi Rob. I agree to most of your points in above article. What you don’t comment is that too many choices for Audirvana Plus users, confuse the importance of hardware equipment, such as cables, tubes and other important hardware components for reproducing good audio output. The biggest market is low level users, hoping to reach Audio Nirvana. That market is the expansion of Audirvana’s biggest possibilities. Real audio lovers already get great sound out of their equipment, but hunts the potensial X that is hidden, somewhere. When the outboard DAC’s arrived, the marketplace started for developers of software to control it.

I installed my version of Audirvana Plus 3 on my Mac Mini (audio server), and was blow away by the improvements in sound quality. I already had converted my entire CD-library to best quality AIFF and Apple Lossless-files, in addition to lots of music-files I have downloaded during the years. The Audirvana remote utility was a headache, but according to developer provides a better solution for max output.

In my equipment sits in front (signal path) a Mac Mini (server), Hegel HD25 Dac, Conrad Johnson PV-10 AL preamp and a modifies Quad 405 power amp and in front a pair of electrostatic Sound Lab speakers. With Audirvana Plus installed, I hear a great improvement in stage, musical impression and depth. But would others have the same experience, with a low level equipment?

The role of components in digital audio reproduction has not been a theme in audio forums and reviews, according to my research with Google. Is responsibility for that the developers or the consumers..?

Best Regards Tom

]]>
By: Rob Campbell https://robcee.net/2017/audirvana-3/#comment-2658 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:50:22 +0000 http://robcee.net/?p=1322#comment-2658 In reply to J Lee Harshbarger.

That’s bang-on. I just reripped some albums from my back collection that are just not available anywhere. The ongoing attempts to catalog my father-in-law’s Jazz Collection is hampered by the gaps in the various CD databases. This is stuff you just can’t get anywhere and some of it’s great. But, if all the average listener cares about is listening to what’s popular right now (and not being able to find it again in 5, 10 or 20 years), then streaming is a good option. Thanks for the reply!

]]>
By: J Lee Harshbarger https://robcee.net/2017/audirvana-3/#comment-2657 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 01:49:23 +0000 http://robcee.net/?p=1322#comment-2657 I’m with you on the streaming issue. I get attached to my music. If it’s streamed, the streaming service could pull it at any time, and suddenly my beloved album is gone. Also, I want to be able to get this album out 20 years later and listen to it, but unless it’s a major seller, it won’t be there then. Most of my music is obscure to begin with.

]]>